Vol. 6, No. 2, Spring 1998, Covering the Former Soviet Union and East Central Europe
Editorial
Reporting on Religion at Its Best
Mark Elliott
"Keston News Service correspondent Lawrence Uzzell deserves a
Pulitzer Prize for his exceptional reporting on recent threats to
religious freedom in Russia." I made this statement at a conference on
the new 1997 Russian law on religion at Emory University, Atlanta, GA,
in October 1997, only to learn, to my pleasant surprise, that Mr.
Uzzell already had been nominated by Professor John Witte, the
organizer of the Emory meeting. Whether or not, in this instance,
Keston's tenacious watchdog for freedom of conscience receives the
recognition he deserves, his 23 April 1998 summary evaluation of the
new law's impact is a perfect illustration of his reporting at its
best. It should be required reading for all serious observers of the
Russian scene. "Concrete Effects of Russia's New Religion Law"
masterfully weaves together the complicated and contradictory strands
of the story in nine single-spaced pages of carefully nuanced text. His
observations deserve our close attention.
-
Full-fledged religious persecution "of the sort seen in China, where one can be arrested simply for organizing a prayer group in one's own home" is "virtually nonexistent" in Russia today; religious repression, "the denial to disfavored confessions of the right to worship and proclaim their beliefs in public," Uzzell notes, "is scattered, but growing;" while religious discrimination, "preferential treatment for some religious bodies over others," is "pervasive."
- Contrary to expectations, enforcement of the new 1997 law to date
has hampered indigenous believers more than expatriate missionaries.
-
Infringements of religious liberty certainly began well before the 1997
law, but have increased since its passage. Conversely, Russia has not
embarked on anything like systematic enforcement so far. Will the teeth
in the text of the law bite hard a) now that official implementing
regulations have been issued (March)? b) Or once the deadline for
reregistration (December 1999) has past? c) Or at whatever point the
West tires of the story and ceases to highlight unfair treatment? d) Or
never, but with the law's draconian provisions ever present to
"perpetuate a climate of intimidation"?
-
Enforcement to date has been uneven a) as some two dozen provincial
laws on religion remain operative, despite their contradiction of
federal legislation and the constitution; b) as the state arbitrarily
delineates favored and unfavored Protestants, favored and unfavored
Muslims, and even favored and unfavored Orthodox; c) as bribery of
local officials--both willing and unwilling--further distorts the law's
provisions; and d) as Protestants, especially Pentecostals, have
suffered more than Catholics. (It should be noted, however, that
Protestant congregations are more numerous than Catholic.)
-
The reemergence of a republic-level equivalent of the heavy-handed
Soviet Council for Religious Affairs appears ever more threatening and
ever more likely.
These are only some of Mr. Uzzell's thought-provoking observations,
which deserve to be read in their entirety. My closing compliment for
Keston's Moscow correspondent is to observe that the best reporting
leads readers to their own reflections and observations. Let me close
with two of my own.
- Given its sparse population, Siberia has endured a disproportionate
number of restrictions of religious liberty and threats of restriction,
based on the 1997 law. Could this be a consequence of decades of
deportations of religious dissidents to this region, along with a
lingering xenophobic Gulag mentality among local officials? (Keston
reports that Nikolai Volkhov, a Siberian provincial adviser on
church-state relations, ascribes the increase in "nontraditional
religions" in his region to the influence of America, which he
describes as "a sewage ditch" for "all sorts of rabble.") Human rights
lawyer Lauren Homer also suggests that Siberia's continuing economic
deterioration has embittered the region toward the center (Moscow) and
the West.
-
Increasingly, Western Mormons appear to be having a singular impact
upon Russian interpretation and implementation of the law, despite the
minimal response of the Russian people to their missionaries. Three
Mormons in the U.S. Senate (Gordon Smith of Oregon and Robert Bennett
and Orrin Hatch of Utah) have traveled to Russia to voice their
opposition to the law and have spearheaded legislation aimed at rolling
back Russian restrictions. Russian officials who headed West in
September 1997 to calm Western fears about the law visited not only
Brussels (European Union) and Washington, but also Salt Lake City
(Mormon headquarters). And in March, the Russian Federal Security
Service, the successor to the KGB, moved expeditiously and successfully
to secure the release of two Mormon missionaries kidnapped in Saratov,
while two British Quakers, two Swedish Pentecostals, and two Hungarians
and one Russian working for ecumenical relief agencies remain in the
hands of kidnappers in the Caucasus. Granted, Russian authority in
Dagestan and Chechnya is limited to nonexistent, but the prompt and
energetic police efforts brought to bear in the Saratov case surprised
this writer and, as Lauren Homer advises, some Mormon officials as
well. Finally, of the several dozen specific instances of
discriminatory enforcement of the new law that have come to the
attention of Western observers to date, none has involved Mormons. This
appears all the more surprising given the barrage of negative Russian
press treatment of cults leading up to the law's passage in September
1997. Although the Salt Lake City headquarters at present prefers not
to publicize Russian incidents, and some Mormon missionaries are having
difficulties in Khabarovsk, Siberia, Mormons still have been relatively
unscathed by legislation widely advertised as a direct challenge to
cults.
Keston Institute and its founder, Michael Bourdeaux, are to be
commended for supporting the outstanding investigative reporting of
Moscow correspondent Larry Uzzell. May his number increase.
Mark Elliott, editor
Editor's note: For subscription rates and order information for
Keston News Service contact Keston Institute, 4 Park Town,
Oxford OX2 6SH, England; tel: 44-865-311-022; fax: 44-865-311-280;
e-mail: keston.institute@keston.org.
Mark Elliott, "Reporting on Religion at Its Best," East-West Church & Ministry Report, 6 (Spring 1998), 15-16.
Written permission is required for reprinting or electronic distribution of any portion of the East-West Church & Ministry Report.
© 1998 East-West Church and Ministry Report
ISSN 1069-5664
East-West Church & Ministry Report | Contents | Search Back Issues | From Our Readers | Subscribe
Feedback